Photon-counting CT of the brain: In Vivo human results and image-quality assessment

85Citations
Citations of this article
94Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Photon-counting detectors offer the potential for improved image quality for brain CT but have not yet been evaluated in Vivo. The purpose of this study was to compare photon-counting detector CT with conventional energy-integrating detector CT for human brains. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Radiation dose-matched energy-integrating detector and photon-counting detector head CT scans were acquired with standardized protocols (tube voltage/current, 120 kV(peak)/370 mAs) in both an anthropomorphic head phantom and 21 human asymptomatic volunteers (mean age, 58.9 -8.5 years). Photon-counting detector thresholds were 22 and 52 keV (low-energy bin, 22-52 keV; high-energy bin, 52-120 keV). Image noise, gray matter, and white matter signal-To-noise ratios and GM-WM contrast and contrast-To-noise ratios were measured. Image quality was scored by 2 neuroradiologists blinded to the CT detector type. Reproducibility was assessed with the intraclass correlation coefficient. Energy-integrating detector and photon-counting detector CT images were compared using a paired t test and the Wilcoxon signed rank test. RESULTS: Photon-counting detector CT images received higher reader scores forGM-WMdifferentiation with lower image noise (all P- .001). Intrareader and interreader reproducibility was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient, -0.86 and 0.79, respectively). Quantitative analysis showed 12.8%-20.6% less image noise for photon-counting detector CT. The SNR of photon-counting detector CT was 19.0%-20.0% higher than of energy-integrating detector CT forGMand WM. The contrast-To-noise ratio of photon-counting detector CT was 15.7% higher for GM-WM contrast and 33.3% higher for GM-WM contrast-To-noise ratio. CONCLUSIONS: Photon-counting detector brain CT scans demonstrated greater gray-white matter contrast compared with conventional CT. This was due to both higher soft-Tissue contrast and lower image noise for photon-counting CT.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pourmorteza, A., Symons, R., Reich, D. S., Bagheri, M., Cork, T. E., Kappler, S., … Bluemke, D. A. (2017). Photon-counting CT of the brain: In Vivo human results and image-quality assessment. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 38(12), 2257–2263. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5402

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free