Reconceptualizing climate change denial: Ideological denialism misdiagnoses climate change and limits effective action

29Citations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Despite increasing scientific evidence supporting the need for immediate and transformative action, effective responses to address climate change remain stymied. Scholars have identified climate change denial as a factor in thwarting policy responses to climate change. We examine new forms of climate change denial that are critical to recognize as the general public and policy-makers consider actions to limit warming. Here we apply a Marxist conception of ideology to broaden our understanding of climate denialism (Marx & Engels, 1977). We introduce the concept of “ideological denialism,” which conceals underlying contradictions and perpetuates the current social order. The ideological denial of climate change involves recognizing climate change as a problem, yet fails to diagnose the root causes and prescribes solutions that maintain the current system. We argue that ideological denialism typically stems from a failure to recognize a growth-dependent economic system as a root driver of climate change. We examine degrowth as a possible means to reorganize social relations with potential to more effectively reduce greenhouse gas emissions and limit global warming.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Petersen, B., Stuart, D., & Gunderson, R. (2019). Reconceptualizing climate change denial: Ideological denialism misdiagnoses climate change and limits effective action. Human Ecology Review, 25(2), 117–141. https://doi.org/10.22459/HER.25.02.2019.08

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free