Testing for Antimodes

  • Hartigan J
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

To determine the number of modes in a one dimensional distribution, we compute for each m the Kolmogorov distance between the empirical distribution $${D_m} = {\text{in}}{{\text{f}}_{F \in {u_m}}}{\text{ su}}{{\text{p}}_x}\left| {{F_n}\left( x \right) - F\left( x \right)} \right|$$Fn, and a distribution F ∈ Um,the set of uniform mixtures with at most m modes. The m — 1 antimodes obtained in the best fitting m—modal distributions, collected for all m,form a hierarchical tree of intervals. To decide which of these empirical antimodes corresponds to an antimode in the true distribution, we define a test statistic based on a ‘shoulder interval’, a maximal interval of constant density that is neither a mode nor an antimode, in a best fitting m-modal uniform mixture. For each empirical antimode, there is a shoulder interval of minimum length including it, and the points in this shoulder interval are taken as a reference set for evaluating the antimode. The statistic is the maximum deviation of the empirical distribution from a monotone density fit in the shoulder interval, and the reference distribution for it is the maximum empirical excursion for a sample from the uniform with the same sample size as the number of points in the shoulder interval. We demonstrate that this reference distribution gives approximately valid significance tests for a range of population distributions, including some with several modes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hartigan, J. A. (2000). Testing for Antimodes (pp. 169–181). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-58250-9_14

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free