The power of negative thinking in and for teacher education

36Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In an anxious world increasingly perceived in terms of risk management, strategies for mapping, articulating and organizing knowledge provide a bulwark against uncertainty. For teacher education, one consequence has been a drive for fullness in relation to knowledge about what teachers should know and be able to do, usually conceived in instrumental terms. Indeed, teacher education, like education more broadly, has been captured by a ‘discursive duopoly’ of instrumentalism, involving the pervasive view that the main purpose of education is to serve the needs of the economy, and consensualism, involving the valorization of agreement regarding this purpose. One way to understand this dynamic in teacher education is in terms of positivity and negativity, whereby the positive refers to social structures, institutions and policies – best practice or teaching standards – that have become reified, while the negative is that which unsettles and disrupts the comfortable stance of the given order of things. Negativity, as a political practice that engages with the positive to reveal the historical and contingent nature of all knowledge, thus offers new conceptual resources, such as antagonism, dissensus, fantasy and impotentiality, for imagining alternative scenarios for teacher education beyond the confines of current policies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Clarke, M., & Phelan, A. (2015). The power of negative thinking in and for teacher education. Power and Education, 7(3), 257–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/1757743815607025

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free