Revisiting student self-improvement

4Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper substantiates the relevance of cultivating the need for self-improvement in students at technical colleges. The authors identify several types of self-improvement and explore their key features. The findings from the authors' psychological/pedagogical study help identify three major levels of self-development. To determine students' self-improvement development levels, the authors employed such research methods as survey by questionnaire, testing, interview, observation, and analysis of activity outcomes. Using the diagnostic method and on the strength of sociological data obtained as part of the study, the authors developed a program consisting of two modules aimed at the deliberate and purposeful cultivation of the need for self-improvement, development of one's volitional qualities of character, nourishing of the ability to self-regulate one's behavior, and fostering of the ability to pursue meaningful life goals. The findings of this study may be of interest to instructors, teachers, and postgraduate students interested in the development and implementation of competency-based learning within the nation's system of higher education.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Applied mathematics as a tool for studying the efficiency of an enterprise

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Econometric model of the effective activity of the enterprise

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Mathematical statistics in the professional activity of future engineers Bachelor's degree programs Technosphere security

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kryucheva, Y. V., Tolstoukhova, I. V., Iakobiuk, L. I., & Vinogradova, M. V. rovna. (2018). Revisiting student self-improvement. International Journal of Engineering and Technology(UAE), 7(4), 292–295. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.38.24487

Readers over time

‘22‘23‘2401234

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Lecturer / Post doc 2

100%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 1

33%

Mathematics 1

33%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1

33%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0