Assessment study of Static-PPP convergence behaviour using GPS, GLONASS and mixed GPS/GLONASS observations

6Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Precise Point Positioning (PPP) has been used for the last decade as a cost-effective alternative for the ordinary DGPS-Differential GPS with an estimated precision sufficient for many applications. PPP requires handling different types of errors using proper models. PPP precision varies with the use of observations from different satellite systems (GPS, GLONASS and mixed GPS/GLONASS) and the duration of observations. This research presents an evaluation study for the variability of Static-PPP precision based on different observation types (GPS, GLONASS and mixed observations) and observation duration. It can be concluded that Static-PPP solution using mixed observations is offering similar accuracy as the one using GPS-only observations and saving 15 minutes observation time. For 30 minutes of observation duration, mixed observations offers improvement percentages of 14%, 26% and 25% for latitude, longitude and height respectively.

References Powered by Scopus

Current State of Precise Point Positioning and Future Prospects and Limitations

236Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Visibility anomaly of GNSS satellite and support from regional systems

25Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Performance evaluation of GPS and GLONASS systems, combined and individually, in precise point positioning

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Kinematic Precise Point Positioning Performance-Based Cost-Effective Robot Localization System

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Farah, A. (2014). Assessment study of Static-PPP convergence behaviour using GPS, GLONASS and mixed GPS/GLONASS observations. Artificial Satellites, 49(1), 55–61. https://doi.org/10.2478/arsa-2014-0005

Readers over time

‘15‘17‘19‘20‘23‘2400.751.52.253

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

71%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 6

75%

Medicine and Dentistry 1

13%

Mathematics 1

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0