Assessing white matter pathology in early-stage parkinson disease using diffusion mri: A systematic review

30Citations
Citations of this article
74Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Structural brain white matter (WM) changes such as axonal caliber, density, myelination, and orientation, along with WM-dependent structural connectivity, may be impacted early in Parkinson disease (PD). Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) has been used extensively to understand such pathological WM changes, and the focus of this systematic review is to understand both the methods utilized and their corresponding results in the context of early-stage PD. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is the most commonly utilized method to probe WM pathological changes. Previous studies have suggested that DTI metrics are sensitive in capturing early disease-associated WM changes in preclinical symptomatic regions such as olfactory regions and the substantia nigra, which is considered to be a hallmark of PD pathology and progression. Postprocessing analytic approaches include region of interest-based analysis, voxel-based analysis, skeletonized approaches, and connectome analysis, each with unique advantages and challenges. While DTI has been used extensively to study WM disorganization in early-stage PD, it has several limitations, including an inability to resolve multiple fiber orientations within each voxel and sensitivity to partial volume effects. Given the subtle changes associated with early-stage PD, these limitations result in inaccuracies that severely impact the reliability of DTI-based metrics as potential biomarkers. To overcome these limitations, advanced dMRI acquisition and analysis methods have been employed, including diffusion kurtosis imaging and q-space diffeomorphic reconstruction. The combination of improved acquisition and analysis in DTI may yield novel and accurate information related to WM-associated changes in early-stage PD. In the current article, we present a systematic and critical review of dMRI studies in early-stage PD, with a focus on recent advances in DTI methodology. Yielding novel metrics, these advanced methods have been shown to detect diffuse WM changes in early-stage PD. These findings support the notion of early axonal damage in PD and suggest thatWMpathologymay go unrecognized until symptoms appear. Finally, the advantages and disadvantages of different dMRI techniques, analysis methods, and software employed are discussed in the context of PD-related pathology.

References Powered by Scopus

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration

8793Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Staging of brain pathology related to sporadic Parkinson's disease

8409Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo‐planar mri

7998Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases and the role of acetylcholinesterase in their pathogenesis

132Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Quadruple abnormal protein aggregates in brainstem pathology and exogenous metal-rich magnetic nanoparticles (and engineered Ti-rich nanorods). The substantia nigrae is a very early target in young urbanites and the gastrointestinal tract a key brainstem portal

80Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Parkinson's Disease and Parkinsonian Syndrome: A Systematic Review

74Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bergamino, M., Keeling, E. G., Mishra, V. R., Stokes, A. M., & Walsh, R. R. (2020). Assessing white matter pathology in early-stage parkinson disease using diffusion mri: A systematic review. Frontiers in Neurology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00314

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2505101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 15

54%

Researcher 13

46%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Neuroscience 14

50%

Psychology 6

21%

Medicine and Dentistry 5

18%

Engineering 3

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0