Transcatheter aortic valve implantation vs. surgical aortic valve replacement for treatment of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis: An updated meta-analysis

342Citations
Citations of this article
393Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aims: Owing to new evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in low-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis, we compared the collective safety and efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) vs. surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) across the entire spectrum of surgical risk patients. Methods and results: The meta-analysis is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42016037273). We identified RCTs comparing TAVI with SAVR in patients with severe aortic stenosis reporting at different follow-up periods. We extracted trial, patient, intervention, and outcome characteristics following predefined criteria. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality up to 2 years for the main analysis. Seven trials that randomly assigned 8020 participants to TAVI (4014 patients) and SAVR (4006 patients) were included. The combined mean STS score in the TAVI arm was 9.4%, 5.1%, and 2.0% for high-, intermediate-, and low surgical risk trials, respectively. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation was associated with a significant reduction of all-cause mortality compared to SAVR {hazard ratio [HR] 0.88 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78-0.99], P = 0.030}; an effect that was consistent across the entire spectrum of surgical risk (P-for-interaction = 0.410) and irrespective of type of transcatheter heart valve (THV) system (P-for-interaction = 0.674). Transcatheter aortic valve implantation resulted in lower risk of strokes [HR 0.81 (95% CI 0.68-0.98), P = 0.028]. Surgical aortic valve replacement was associated with a lower risk of major vascular complications [HR 1.99 (95% CI 1.34-2.93), P = 0.001] and permanent pacemaker implantations [HR 2.27 (95% CI 1.47-3.64), P < 0.001] compared to TAVI. Conclusion: Compared with SAVR, TAVI is associated with reduction in all-cause mortality and stroke up to 2 years irrespective of baseline surgical risk and type of THV system.

References Powered by Scopus

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement

54002Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials

26213Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients

5509Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease

3585Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

2107Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

1505Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Siontis, G. C. M., Overtchouk, P., Cahill, T. J., Modine, T., Prendergast, B., Praz, F., … Windecker, S. (2019). Transcatheter aortic valve implantation vs. surgical aortic valve replacement for treatment of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis: An updated meta-analysis. European Heart Journal, 40(38), 3143–3153. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz275

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 100

63%

Researcher 40

25%

Professor / Associate Prof. 14

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 154

83%

Nursing and Health Professions 15

8%

Engineering 10

5%

Neuroscience 7

4%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 2
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free