How does knowledge circulate in a regulatory network? Observing a European Platform of Regulatory Authorities meeting

31Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Multi-level networks of regulatory authorities are considered as vectors of knowledge circulation, norm diffusion, and regulatory coordination. However, this is often assumed without empirical scrutiny of the concrete “micro-dynamics” between individual participants in networks, which remain a “black box” for analysts. This paper is mainly based on direct observation and informal interviews conducted during a meeting of the European Platform of Regulatory Authorities in charge of regulation of the broadcasting sector. It seeks to elucidate what deliberation, socialization, and learning, considered as devices typical of “soft” governance modes, mean as concrete social practices within a network.

References Powered by Scopus

Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination

5354Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

How institutions evolve: The political economy of skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan

1767Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

How ideas spread: Whose norms matter? Norm localization and institutional change in Asian regionalism

1543Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Networking for resources: how regulators use networks to compensate for lower staff levels

25Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Too much of a good thing? A systematic review about the conditions of learning in governance networks

24Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The drivers of regulatory networking: Policy learning between homophily and convergence

22Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Papadopoulos, Y. (2018). How does knowledge circulate in a regulatory network? Observing a European Platform of Regulatory Authorities meeting. Regulation and Governance, 12(4), 431–450. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12171

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 10

42%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

25%

Researcher 6

25%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 18

75%

Business, Management and Accounting 3

13%

Arts and Humanities 2

8%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free