Performance and cardiac evaluation before and after a 3-week training camp for 400-meter sprinters - An observational, nonrandomized study

2Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective To study the performance and cardiovascular function after a 3-week training camp in athletes competing in an anaerobically dominant sport. Methods Twenty-three competitive 400-m athletes were enrolled in this non-randomized study, 17 took part in a 3-week training camp in South-Africa (intervention), but one declined follow-up assessment, while 6 pursued in-door winter training in Sweden and served as controls. Electrocardiography, transthoracic echocardiography, blood test analyses, maximal exercise tolerance test, and a 300-m sprint test with lactate measurements ([La]peak) were performed before and after the training camp period. Results At baseline, there were no clinically significant pathological findings in any measurements. The training period resulted in improved 300m-sprint performance [n = 16; running time 36.71 (1.39) vs. 35.98 (1.13) s; p<0.01] and higher peak lactate values. Despite 48% more training sessions than performed on home ground (n = 6), myocardial biomarkers decreased significantly (NT-pro BNP -38%; p<0.05, troponin T -16%; p<0.05). Furthermore, resting heart rate (-7%; p<0.01) and left ventricular systolic and diastolic volumes decreased -6% (p<0.01) and -10% (p<0.05), respectively. Conclusions Intense physical activity at training camp improved the performance level, likely due to improved anaerobic capacity indicated by higher [La]peak. There were no clinically significant adverse cardiac changes after this period of predominantly anaerobic training.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Skalenius, M., Mattsson, C. M., Dahlberg, P., Bergfeldt, L., & Ravn-Fischer, A. (2019). Performance and cardiac evaluation before and after a 3-week training camp for 400-meter sprinters - An observational, nonrandomized study. PLoS ONE, 14(5). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217856

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free