Liquefied natural gas as a new hazard; Learning processes in norwegian fire brigades

Abstract

The innovation and utilization of new products leads to technological changes incontemporary societies and a need for the Fire Brigades (FBs) to update their expertise regarding thechallenges these new products may represent. The present study examines learning processes for ninefire brigades in Norway, selected where Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) facilities are in their jurisdictionand/or because they have handled LNG road accidents. The process of acquiring the necessary newknowledge and skills is researched inductively, and each FB is viewed as a unit in the Norwegian fireand rescue community, i.e., a multi-unit learning organization. Kolb's learning cycle is used to discussthe findings. Large variations in learning processes were used in the different FBs, varying from shortclassroom courses held by external consultants to a series of learning episodes planned and directedby FB personnel. It was found that each FB focused locally and independently from other FBs whenacquiring new knowledge. There was very limited knowledge transfer from FBs experienced withLNG facilities to "newcomers". There is no established national knowledge-sharing network on LNG.There are, however, regional partner groups, mainly involving the FB and a distribution company,mentioned by all studied FBs to be the most important partner for learning. The inter-municipalcommittee against acute pollution (IUA) was the second most important learning cooperation partner.It was, however, discovered that LNG test releases gave rise to observations regarding the extensionof the flammable cloud versus the visible cloud that was interpreted wrongly due to the lack oftheoretical understanding of the influence of the air relative humidity. This was explained to oneregional partner group that invited, and therefore asked, an academic about this issue during atraining session. This partner group arranged demonstrations for all FBs involved along the pathof LNG transport from the production site to their end-users. Surprisingly, there was very limitedknowledge exchange between partner groups in different geographical regions, though one of thesewas certainly more knowledgeable. The present study revealed that knowledge sharing must beimproved, at least when it comes to potential LNG incidents.