Imaging results in a consecutive series of 530 new patients in the Birmingham Headache Service

38Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Guidelines recommend imaging only headache patients with sinister features in the history or on examination. We prospectively collected data on imaging newly presenting patients to a UK headache service. CT and MRI results were classified as normal or showing an insignificant or significant abnormality. Over 5 years, 3,655 new patients (69% female; mean age 42.0 years) with headache disorders were seen. Five hundred thirty (14.5%) underwent imaging with large differences in the proportion referred by each consultant. There were more insignificant abnormalities on MRI (46%) than CT (28%). There were 11 significantly abnormal results (2.1% of those imaged). Significant abnormalities were found in patients diagnosed with migraine in 1.2% and in 0.9% of those with tension-type headache. Significant abnormalities in those suspected to have an intracranial abnormality occurred in 5.5%. This supports the practice of selecting patients with suspicious findings for imaging, rather than imaging all patients. © 2010 Springer-Verlag.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Clarke, C. E., Edwards, J., Nicholl, D. J., & Sivaguru, A. (2010). Imaging results in a consecutive series of 530 new patients in the Birmingham Headache Service. Journal of Neurology, 257(8), 1274–1278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-010-5506-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free