Yield of Advanced Adenoma and Cancer Based on Polyp Size Detected at Screening Flexible Sigmoidoscopy

31Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background & Aims: Observational screening of the colon with subsequent referral for colonoscopy raises questions about the threshold of polyp size that necessitates referral. To examine the yield at colonoscopy when a given size lesion is observed, we assessed the yield of advanced adenoma and cancer at colonoscopy based on the size of the abnormality detected at flexible sigmoidoscopy (FSG). Methods: We used data from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial, a randomized, controlled, community-based study of FSG. Results: Subsequent colonoscopy was performed on 10,850 subjects (60.4% male; mean age, 62.9 years) with a polyp visualized on screening FSG. For women with a polyp 0.5-0.9 cm on FSG (n = 1426), the yield in the distal colon on colonoscopy was 0.6% for cancer (number needed to screen [NNS] = 166) and 14.5% for advanced adenoma (NNS = 7). In men (n = 2183), the yield was 0.7% (NNS = 142) for cancer and 15.9% (NNS = 6) for advanced adenoma. Among persons with polyps 0.5-0.9 cm identified on FSG, 5.5% (198/3609) had distal advanced adenomas that measured <1.0 cm but had villous histology or high-grade dysplasia, and 9.9% (357/3609) had adenomas ≥1 cm. Conclusions: The yield for a distal advanced adenomatous lesion when a polyp 0.5-0.9 cm is observed at FSG is substantial and is due to the presence of advanced histology in polyps <1 cm and to detection of polyps that measure ≥1.0 cm on colonoscopy. Establishing thresholds for observation versus evaluation will require careful assessment of the overall yield. © 2006 AGA Institute.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schoen, R. E., Weissfeld, J. L., Pinsky, P. F., & Riley, T. (2006). Yield of Advanced Adenoma and Cancer Based on Polyp Size Detected at Screening Flexible Sigmoidoscopy. Gastroenterology, 131(6), 1683–1689. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2006.08.025

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free