Application of a modular particle-continuum method to partially rarefied, hypersonic flow

0Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The Modular Particle-Continuum (MPC) method is used to simulate partially-rarefied, hypersonic flow over a sting-mounted planetary probe configuration. This hybrid method uses computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to solve the Navier-Stokes equations in regions that are continuum, while using direct simulation Monte Carlo (DSMC) in portions of the flow that are rarefied. The MPC method uses state-based coupling to pass information between the two flow solvers and decouples both time-step and mesh densities required by each solver. It is parallelized for distributed memory systems using dynamic domain decomposition and internal energy modes can be consistently modeled to be out of equilibrium with the translational mode in both solvers. The MPC results are compared to both full DSMC and CFD predictions and available experimental measurements. By using DSMC in only regions where the flow is nonequilibrium, the MPC method is able to reproduce full DSMC results down to the level of velocity and rotational energy probability density functions while requiring a fraction of the computational time. © 2011 American Institute of Physics.

References Powered by Scopus

Scalar and parallel optimized implementation of the direct simulation Monte Carlo method

282Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A modular particle-continuum numerical method for hypersonic non-equilibrium gas flows

152Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Generation of the Chapman-Enskog Distribution

120Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Deschenes, T. R., & Boyd, I. D. (2011). Application of a modular particle-continuum method to partially rarefied, hypersonic flow. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1333, pp. 539–544). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3562703

Readers over time

‘10‘12‘15‘16‘19‘2300.751.52.253

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

44%

Researcher 4

44%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 5

56%

Physics and Astronomy 2

22%

Computer Science 1

11%

Materials Science 1

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0