Magnetic resonance spectroscopy outperforms perfusion in distinguishing between pseudoprogression and disease progression in patients with glioblastoma

7Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: There is a need to establish biomarkers that distinguish between pseudoprogression (PsP) and true tumor progression in patients with glioblastoma (GBM) treated with chemoradiation. Methods: We analyzed magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) and dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MR perfusion data in patients with GBM with PsP or disease progression after chemoradiation. MRSI metabolites of interest included intratumoral choline (Cho), myo-inositol (mI), glutamate + glutamine (Glx), lactate (Lac), and creatine on the contralateral hemisphere (c-Cr). Student T-tests and area under the ROC curve analyses were used to detect group differences in metabolic ratios and their ability to predict clinical status, respectively. Results: 28 subjects (63 ± 9 years, 19 men) were evaluated. Subjects with true progression (n = 20) had decreased enhancing region mI/c-Cr (P =. 011), a marker for more aggressive tumors, compared to those with PsP, which predicted tumor progression (AUC: 0.84 [0.76, 0.92]). Those with true progression had elevated Lac/Glx (P =. 0009), a proxy of the Warburg effect, compared to those with PsP which predicted tumor progression (AUC: 0.84 [0.75, 0.92]). Cho/c-Cr did not distinguish between PsP and true tumor progression. Despite rCBV (AUC: 0.70 [0.60, 0.80]) and rCBF (AUC: 0.75 [0.65, 0.84]) being individually predictive of tumor response, they added no additional predictive value when combined with MRSI metabolic markers. Conclusions: Incorporating enhancing lesion MRSI measures of mI/c-Cr and Lac/Glx into brain tumor imaging protocols can distinguish between PsP and true progression and inform patient management decisions.

References Powered by Scopus

Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma

17430Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network

5924Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: Response assessment in neuro-oncology working group

3146Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Pseudoprogression versus true progression in glioblastoma: what neurosurgeons need to know

14Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Advanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Treated Glioblastoma: A Pictorial Essay

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Advances in Neuro-Oncological Imaging: An Update on Diagnostic Approach to Brain Tumors

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

El-Abtah, M. E., Talati, P., Fu, M., Chun, B., Clark, P., Peters, A., … Ratai, E. M. (2022). Magnetic resonance spectroscopy outperforms perfusion in distinguishing between pseudoprogression and disease progression in patients with glioblastoma. Neuro-Oncology Advances, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdac128

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

43%

Researcher 2

29%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 3

33%

Immunology and Microbiology 3

33%

Engineering 2

22%

Computer Science 1

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free