Lexical representation of Mandarin tones by non-tonal second-language learners

  • Han J
  • Tsukada K
9Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The present study examined whether second language (L2) learners can lexically encode the tonal contrasts that do not occur in their native language. Advanced Korean learners of Mandarin performed a lexical decision task with medium-term repetition priming. The repeated words were either identical or interchanged with confusable tones. The results showed that advanced L2 learners behaved similarly to the native listeners in processing of L2 tones in favor of the correct lexical items, but still showed differences from native listeners, suggesting that L2 learners may have difficulty in utilizing the L2 sounds for word recognition.

References Powered by Scopus

Second language acquisition of Mandarin Chinese tones by tonal and non-tonal language speakers

165Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Asymmetric lexical access and fuzzy lexical representations in second language learners

79Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Contribution of Segmental and Tonal Information in Mandarin Spoken Word Processing

52Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Learning and teaching Chinese as a foreign language: A scoping review

18Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Elucidating the influences of embodiment and conceptual metaphor on lexical and non-speech tone learning

13Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Advanced Second Language Learners of Mandarin Show Persistent Deficits for Lexical Tone Encoding in Picture-to-Word Form Matching

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Han, J.-I., & Tsukada, K. (2020). Lexical representation of Mandarin tones by non-tonal second-language learners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 148(1), EL46–EL50. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0001586

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 3

38%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

25%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

25%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Linguistics 4

57%

Arts and Humanities 2

29%

Social Sciences 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0