In vivo determination of renal stone composition with dual-energy computed tomography

  • Corbett J
  • Harmse W
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Composition of renal stones influences management of patients with renal stone disease. Currently stone composition can only be analysed ex vivo after stone extraction or passage, but recent introduction of dual-energy computed tomography (CT) to clinical practice has raised interest in the ability of this technology to determine composition of renal stones in vivo.Objectives: To determine renal stone composition in patients using single-source dual-energy rapid-peak kilovolt (kVp) switching CT.Method: Nineteen patients with renal stones for percutaneous nephrolithotomy were evaluated with single-source dual-energy computed tomography on a Discovery CT 750HD. The Gemstone Spectral Imaging (GSI) effective atomic number (Zeff) and attenuation at 70 keV monochromatic energy were used to predict the stone composition. Infrared spectroscopy and x-ray diffraction of stones after extraction served as the reference standard.Results: Two (10.5%) of the 19 stones had uric acid as major component. The other 17 (89.5%) were calcium-based stones. No statistically significant difference between the GSI Zeff and calculated effective atomic number (Z) for stone compounds was found. The GSI Zeff and attenuation could differentiate between uric acid and non-uric acid stones. No differentiation between different calcium stones could be made.Conclusion: Uric acid and non-uric acid renal stones can be differentiated with single-source dual-energy in vivo. The GSI Zeff reflects the dominant material in polycrystalline stones.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Corbett, J.-H., & Harmse, W. S. (2014). In vivo determination of renal stone composition with dual-energy computed tomography. South African Journal of Radiology, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/sajr.v18i1.605

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

100%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 4

57%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

14%

Social Sciences 1

14%

Engineering 1

14%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 21

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free