A mixed-methods investigation of the motivations, goals, and aspirations of male and female academic medical faculty

63Citations
Citations of this article
111Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose Understanding the goals and aspirations of the physician-scientist workforce can inform policies to promote retention. The authors explored gender differences therein, given women's increasing representation. Method In 2010-2011, the authors qualitatively analyzed interviews with 100 former recipients of National Institutes of Health career development awards and 28 of their mentors. They also compared survey responses of 1,267 clinician-investigators who received these awards from 2006 to 2009, using logistic regression to evaluate gender differences after adjusting for other characteristics. Results Interview participants described relatively consistent career goals, including scientific contribution and desire to positively affect lives through research, clinical care, and teaching. For many, the specific ways they sought to achieve and measure goal attainment evolved over time. Survey respondents endorsed a goal of publishing high-quality research with highest frequency (97.3%, no significant gender difference). Women were more likely to endorse the importance of balancing work and other activities (95.5% vs. 90.5%, P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jones, R. D. C., Griffith, K. A., Ubel, P. A., Stewart, A., & Jagsi, R. (2016). A mixed-methods investigation of the motivations, goals, and aspirations of male and female academic medical faculty. Academic Medicine, 91(8), 1089–1097. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001244

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free