The Myth of Normal Reading

11Citations
Citations of this article
59Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We argue that the educational and psychological sciences must embrace the diversity of reading rather than chase the phantom of normal reading behavior. We critically discuss the research practice of asking participants in experiments to read “normally.” We then draw attention to the large cross-cultural and linguistic diversity around the world and consider the enormous diversity of reading situations and goals. Finally, we observe that people bring a huge diversity of brains and experiences to the reading task. This leads to four implications: First, there are important lessons for how to conduct psycholinguistic experiments; second, we need to move beyond Anglocentric reading research and produce models of reading that reflect the large cross-cultural diversity of languages and types of writing systems; third, we must acknowledge that there are multiple ways of reading and reasons for reading, and none of them is normal or better or a “gold standard”; and fourth, we must stop stigmatizing individuals who read differently and for different reasons, and there should be increased focus on teaching the ability to extract information relevant to the person’s goals. What is important is not how well people decode written language and how fast people read but what people comprehend given their own stated goals.

References Powered by Scopus

Constructing Inferences During Narrative Text Comprehension

1806Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The independence of syntactic processing

759Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

On the Anglocentricities of Current Reading Research and Practice: The Perils of Overreliance on an ";Outlier" Orthography

741Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Language-universal and script-specific factors in the recognition of letters in visual crowding: The effects of lexicality, hemifield, and transitional probabilities in a right-to-left script

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Enhanced Literate Mind Hypothesis

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Age-Related Differences in Understanding Pronominal Reference in Sentence Comprehension: An Electrophysiological Investigation

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Huettig, F., & Ferreira, F. (2023). The Myth of Normal Reading. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 18(4), 863–870. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916221127226

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 14

56%

Researcher 5

20%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

16%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 7

33%

Social Sciences 5

24%

Linguistics 5

24%

Design 4

19%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free