Physical activity among Amish and non-Amish adults living in Ohio Appalachia

9Citations
Citations of this article
50Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

To understand the behavioral lifestyle factors that may contribute to lower cancer incidence rates among the Amish population, this study evaluated differences in physical activity (PA) levels between Amish and non-Amish adults living in Ohio Appalachia. Amish (n = 134) and non-Amish (n = 154) adults completed face-to-face interviews as part of a cancer-related lifestyle study. Self-report of PA level was measured by the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) and by a diary of steps/day (pedometer: Digi-Walker SW-200). Total metabolic equivalent tasks (MET) minutes was calculated from the IPAQ and average number of steps/day from a pedometer diary. Amish males walked more steps/day (mean ± standard error (SE): 11,447 ± 611 vs. 7,605 ± 643; P < 0.001) and had a higher IPAQ score (MET min/week) (mean ± SE: 8,354 ± 701 vs. 5,547 ± 690; P < 0.01) than non-Amish males. In addition, Amish farmers walked significantly more steps/day than Amish nonfarmers (mean ± SE: 15,278 ± 1,297 vs. 10,742 ± 671; P<0.01). There was a trend for Amish females to walk more steps/day (mean ± SE: 7,750 ± 477 vs. 6,547 ± 437; P = 0.06) and to have higher IPAQ scores (mean ± SE: 4,966 ± 503 vs. 3,702 ± 450; P = 0.06) compared to non-Amish females. Two measures of PA demonstrated a higher PA level among Amish males, especially farmers, and a trend for higher PA level among Amish females. Higher levels of PA warrants further investigation as one factor potentially contributing to lower cancer incidence rates documented among the Amish. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC (outside the USA) 2011.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Katz, M. L., Ferketich, A. K., Broder-Oldach, B., Harley, A., Reiter, P. L., Paskett, E. D., & Bloomfield, C. D. (2012). Physical activity among Amish and non-Amish adults living in Ohio Appalachia. Journal of Community Health, 37(2), 434–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-011-9460-9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free