Improved lower bounds for learning intersections of halfspaces

0Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We prove new lower bounds for learning intersections of halfspaces, one of the most important concept classes in computational learning theory. Our main result is that any statistical-query algorithm for learning the intersection of √n halfspaces in n dimensions must make 2Ω(√n queries. This is the first non-trivial lower bound on the statistical query dimension for this concept class (the previous best lower bound was n Ω(log n)). Our lower bound holds even for intersections of low-weight halfspaces. In the latter case, it is nearly tight. We also show that the intersection of two majorities (low-weight halfspaces) cannot be computed by a polynomial threshold function (PTF) with fewer than n Ω((log n)/log log n) monomials. This is the first superpolynomial lower bound on the PTF length of this concept class, and is nearly optimal. For intersections of k = ω(log n) low-weight halfspaces, we improve our lower bound to min{2Ω(2(√), n Ω(k/log k)}, which too is nearly optimal. As a consequence, intersections of even two halfspaces are not computable by polynomial-weight PTFs, the most expressive class of functions known to be efficiently learnable via Jackson's Harmonic Sieve algorithm. Finally, we report our progress on the weak learnability of intersections of halfspaces under the uniform distribution. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Klivans, A. R., & Sherstov, A. A. (2006). Improved lower bounds for learning intersections of halfspaces. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 4005 LNAI, pp. 335–349). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/11776420_26

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free