Decision-Making Approach to Selecting Optimal Platform of Service Variants

4Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Nowadays, it is anticipated that service sector companies will be inspired to follow mass customization trends of industrial sector. However, services are more abstract than products and therefore concepts for mass customization in manufacturing domain cannot be transformed without a methodical change. This paper is focused on the development of a methodological framework to support decisions in a selection of optimal platform of service variants when compatibility problems between service options occurred. The approach is based on mutual relations between waste and constrained design space entropy. For this purpose, software for quantification of constrained and waste design space is developed. Practicability of the methodology is presented on a realistic case.

References Powered by Scopus

A Mathematical Theory of Communication

37447Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Product variety management

505Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Implications of mass customization for operations management: An exploratory survey

183Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

An Improved Method for Combining Conflicting Evidences Based on the Similarity Measure and Belief Function Entropy

88Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Modeling and application of configuration complexity scale: concept for customized production

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Modularized Design of ACDCD: An Improved Spectral Clustering-Based Approach

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Modrak, V., Bednar, S., & Semanco, P. (2016). Decision-Making Approach to Selecting Optimal Platform of Service Variants. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9840679

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘19‘20‘2300.751.52.253

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

57%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

29%

Researcher 1

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Design 2

29%

Social Sciences 2

29%

Business, Management and Accounting 2

29%

Materials Science 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0