Automatic Speaking Assessment of Spontaneous L2 Finnish and Swedish

9Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The development of automated systems for evaluating spontaneous speech is desirable for L2 learning, as it can be used as a facilitating tool for self-regulated learning, language proficiency assessment, and teacher training programs. However, languages with fewer learners face challenges due to the scarcity of training data. Recent advancements in machine learning have made it possible to develop systems with a limited amount of target domain data. To this end, we propose automatic speaking assessment systems for spontaneous L2 speech in Finnish and Finland Swedish, comprising six machine learning models each, and report their performance in terms of statistical evaluation criteria.

References Powered by Scopus

Learning a similarity metric discriminatively, with application to face verification

3695Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Investigating Fluency in EFL: A Quantitative Approach

510Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Exploring measures and perceptions of fluency in the speech of second language learners

359Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Advancing Language Assessment with AI and ML–Leaning into AI is Inevitable, but Can Theory Keep Up?

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Test-Taker Engagement in AI Technology-Mediated Language Assessment

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Automated content assessment and feedback for Finnish L2 learners in a picture description speaking task

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Al-Ghezi, R., Voskoboinik, K., Getman, Y., Von Zansen, A., Kallio, H., Kurimo, M., … Hildén, R. (2023). Automatic Speaking Assessment of Spontaneous L2 Finnish and Swedish. Language Assessment Quarterly, 20(4–5), 421–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2023.2292265

Readers over time

‘24‘2506121824

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

43%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

29%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

14%

Researcher 1

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Linguistics 3

50%

Social Sciences 1

17%

Engineering 1

17%

Arts and Humanities 1

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0