Enhancing Information Retrieval in Fact Extraction and Verification

4Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Modern fact verification systems have distanced themselves from the black box paradigm by providing the evidence used to infer their veracity judgments. Hence, evidence-backed fact verification systems’ performance heavily depends on the capabilities of their retrieval component to identify these facts. A popular evaluation benchmark for these systems is the FEVER task, which consists of determining the veracity of short claims using sentences extracted from Wikipedia. In this paper, we present a novel approach to the the retrieval steps of the FEVER task leveraging the graph structure of Wikipedia. The retrieval models surpass state of the art results at both sentence and document level. Additionally, we show that by feeding our retrieved evidence to the best-performing textual entailment model, we set a new state of the art in the FEVER competition.

References Powered by Scopus

The graph neural network model

6492Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The probabilistic relevance framework: BM25 and beyond

2180Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Efficiently Teaching an Effective Dense Retriever with Balanced Topic Aware Sampling

254Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Explainability of Automated Fact Verification Systems: A Comprehensive Review

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

PubMed Retrieval with RAG Techniques

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Bootstrapped Pre-training with Dynamic Identifier Prediction for Generative Retrieval

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Guzman-Olivares, D., Quijano-Sanchez, L., & Liberatore, F. (2023). Enhancing Information Retrieval in Fact Extraction and Verification. In FEVER 2023 - 6th Fact Extraction and VERification Workshop, Proceedings (pp. 38–48). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.fever-1.4

Readers over time

‘23‘24‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

75%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

13%

Researcher 1

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 9

75%

Neuroscience 2

17%

Medicine and Dentistry 1

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0