Identification of predictors and model for predicting prolonged length of stay in dengue patients

7Citations
Citations of this article
74Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: Our objective is to identify the predictive factors and predict hospital length of stay (LOS) in dengue patients, for efficient utilization of hospital resources. Methods: We collected 1360 medical patient records of confirmed dengue infection from 2012 to 2017 at Max group of hospitals in India. We applied two different data mining algorithms, logistic regression (LR) with elastic-net, and random forest to extract predictive factors and predict the LOS. We used an area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity to evaluate the performance of the classifiers. Results: The classifiers performed well, with logistic regression (LR) with elastic-net providing an AUC score of 0.75 and random forest providing a score of 0.72. Out of 1148 patients, 364 (32%) patients had prolonged length of stay (LOS) (> 5 days) and overall hospitalization mean was 4.03 ± 2.44 days (median ± IQR). The highest number of dengue cases belonged to the age group of 10-20 years (21.1%) with a male predominance. Moreover, the study showed that blood transfusion, emergency admission, assisted ventilation, low haemoglobin, high total leucocyte count (TLC), low or high haematocrit, and low lymphocytes have a significant correlation with prolonged LOS. Conclusion: Our findings demonstrated that the logistic regression with elastic-net was the best fit with an AUC of 0.75 and there is a significant association between LOS greater than five days and identified patient-specific variables. This method can identify the patients at highest risks and help focus time and resources.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shahid Ansari, M., Jain, D., Harikumar, H., Rana, S., Gupta, S., Budhiraja, S., & Venkatesh, S. (2021). Identification of predictors and model for predicting prolonged length of stay in dengue patients. Health Care Management Science, 24(4), 786–798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-021-09571-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free