The efficiency and fairness of a fixed budget resource allocation game

18Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We study the resource allocation game in which price anticipating players compete for multiple divisible resources. In the scheme, each player submits a bid to a resource and receives a share of the resource according to the proportion of his bid to the total bids. Unlike the previous study (e.g. [5]), we consider the case when the players have budget constraints, i.e. each player's total bids is fixed. We show that there always exists a Nash equilibrium when the players' utility functions are strongly competitive. We study the efficiency and fairness at the Nash equilibrium. We show the tight efficiency bound of Θ(1/√m) for the m player balanced game. For the special cases when there is only one resource or when there are two players with linear utility functions, the efficiency is 3/4. We extend the classical notion of envy-freeness to measure fairness. We show that despite a possibly large utility gap, any Nash equilibrium is 0.828-approximately envy-free in this game. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhang, L. (2005). The efficiency and fairness of a fixed budget resource allocation game. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 3580, pp. 485–496). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/11523468_40

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free