Using systems thinking to design actionable futures: a nuclear weapons example

  • Young L
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

It is a general observation that foresight is analogised with forecast. Yet foresight, or futures thinking, is not predictive or deterministic. The misperception appears to be based on the belief that foresight does not often result in tangible results that are immediately applicable within an executive or policy decision arena. Foresight, it is assumed, is unfounded on reality and thus not relevant to fast tempo or strategic level operations. This paper contends that the use of evidence-based methods allows foresight work to be immediately operational and useful. Using a case study of nuclear weapon security within Pakistan, this paper explores the structured use of systems thinking, scenario development and options analysis to develop plausible, feasible and actionable strategic policy options. The case study demonstrates that it is possible to develop quantifiable options derived out of traditional foresight methods. This paper argues that useful foresight needs to be tangible and provide feasible options.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Young, L. D. (2018). Using systems thinking to design actionable futures: a nuclear weapons example. European Journal of Futures Research, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40309-018-0138-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free