The firm and the authority relation: Hierarchy vs. organization

6Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Research in the modern theory of economic organization predominantly addresses issues relating to one or a combination of three fundamental questions originally posed or implied by Ronald Coase (1937): Why are there firms? What are the firm’s boundaries? And how is the firm’s organizational structure determined? (Foss 1997: 175; Foss and Klein 2008: 426; cf. Garrouste and Saussier 2008: 23). A common starting point for this research, which is often referred to simply as the "theory of the firm," is the assertion of a dichotomy between market and organization. Market transactions are coordinated in a decentralized manner through the "high-powered incentives" of the price mechanism (Williamson 1985: 131-162; 1988), while transactions "within firms" depend on the fiat power in formal, hierarchical organization to coordinate transactions under low-powered (cost plus) incentives.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bylund, P. L. (2014). The firm and the authority relation: Hierarchy vs. organization. In Austrian Theory and Economic Organization: Reaching Beyond Free Market Boundaries (pp. 97–120). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137368805_5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free