Local Democratic Renewal by Deliberative Participatory Instruments: Participatory Budgeting in Comparative Study

18Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Since the 1990s there has been a trend towards more dialogue-oriented political participation—a “deliberative turn,” in the phrase of Dryzek (2003). Deliberative dialogical democracy often develops a path to come from conflict to consensual deliberative decision making. Deliberative instruments were positively influenced by local agenda processes in the 1990s. In the new millennium participatory instruments such as participatory budgeting have spread all over Europe. What kind of instruments are implemented? Who are the key actors? Who is included and who is excluded? Are these instruments enhancing legitimacy and are they able to channel growing political protest? In four systematically analyzed case studies from Estonia, Slovakia, Spain, and Germany different types become apparent.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kersting, N., Gasparikova, J., Iglesias, A., & Krenjova, J. (2016). Local Democratic Renewal by Deliberative Participatory Instruments: Participatory Budgeting in Comparative Study. In Governance and Public Management (pp. 317–331). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52548-2_18

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free