Screening for hypovitaminosis D: Cost-effective or not?

10Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Few topics have elicited more emotion than the issue of screening for vitamin D status and the discussion on the need for global supplementation with vitamin D metabolites. The importance of the problem is highlighted by the USPSTF posted draft research plan with the aim of making an update recommendations statement, possibly next year. Here, we discuss two different viewpoints on screening for vitamin D status: for and against. In the literature there are scientifically sound opinions supporting pro and cons positions. However, we believe that the best way to definitively elucidate this issue is the implementation of a randomized controlled trial evaluating clinical outcomes or harms in persons screened versus those not screened for vitamin D defi ciency. The feasibility of such a trial is probably questionable owing to uncertainties still present concerning th reshold for vitamin D sufficiency and end points (that is, for example, improved bone mineral density, reduced risk of falls and so on) to be reached.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Minisola, S., Colangelo, L., Cipriani, C., Pepe, J., Cook, D., & Mathieu, C. (2019, March 1). Screening for hypovitaminosis D: Cost-effective or not? European Journal of Endocrinology. BioScientifica Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-18-0977

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free