3.0 T MRI diagnostic features: Comparison with lower magnetic fields

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

3.0 T magnetic resonance (MR) units are optimized for high-resolution morphological and functional imaging, especially of the head and neck, and offer a number of advantages over lower-field systems, such as a higher signal/noise ratio (SNR) and greater spatial and temporal resolution (Fig. 3.1) [1-4]. Drawbacks include greater specific absorption rates (SAR), acoustic noise, and dielectric resonance, although in the more recent imagers these problems have largely been resolved by improvements in hardware and software. © 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Scarabino, T., Giannatempo, G. M., Popolizio, T., Simeone, A., Maggialetti, A., Maggialetti, N., & Salvolini, U. (2006). 3.0 T MRI diagnostic features: Comparison with lower magnetic fields. In High Field Brain MRI: Use in Clinical Practice (pp. 10–20). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31776-7_3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free