General Bayesian theories and the emergence of the exclusivity principle

5Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We address the problem of reconstructing quantum theory from the perspective of an agent who makes bets about the outcomes of possible experiments. We build a general Bayesian framework that can be used to organize the agent's beliefs and update them when new information becomes available. Our framework includes as special cases classical and quantum probability theory, as well as other forms of probabilistic reasoning that may arise in future physical theories. Building on this framework, we develop a notion of an ideal experiment, which in quantum theory coincides with the notion of projective measurement. We then prove that, in every general Bayesian theory, ideal experiments must satisfy the exclusivity principle, a property of projective measurements that plays a central role in the characterization of quantum correlations. Our result suggests that the set of quantum correlations may be completely characterized in terms of Bayesian consistency conditions.

References Powered by Scopus

"Relative state" formulation of quantum mechanics

1983Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Quantum nonlocality as an axiom

1090Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Information causality as a physical principle

498Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Kochen-Specker contextuality

88Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Probabilistic theories and reconstructions of quantum theory

29Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Certifying Sets of Quantum Observables with Any Full-Rank State

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chiribella, G., Cabello, A., Kleinmann, M., & Müller, M. P. (2020). General Bayesian theories and the emergence of the exclusivity principle. Physical Review Research, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.042001

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

35%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

25%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

20%

Researcher 4

20%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Physics and Astronomy 17

81%

Social Sciences 2

10%

Decision Sciences 1

5%

Computer Science 1

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free