Determinants of asylum seekers’ health and medical care in Germany

Abstract

Asylum seekers in Germany are exposed to a variety of health-related stressors, while their access to medical care is impaired. This review explains some of the determinants that structure this situation, for example by elaborating on how the Asylum Seekers’ Benefits Act (ASBA), billing via treatment vouchers, and accommodation in refugee shelters affect asylum seekers’ health and healthcare utilization. Hereby, it becomes clear that the exclusion of asylum seekers from the welfare system is detrimental to their health, is expensive, and raises ethical and legal questions. In particular, the huge discretionary scope of the social welfare offices in the assumption of costs as well as the different models for billing medical services for asylum seekers are potentially unjust and lead to a plurality of care, which lacks legal and ethical justification. The second part of the article shows that asylum seekers generally suffer from the same health problems as people with statutory health insurance—with the exception of mental illnesses, which are substantially more common among asylum seekers, but are often undiagnosed and frequently inadequately treated. This leads to three practical conclusions: (1) asylum seekers should be integrated into statutory health insurance, (2) from a public health point of view, accommodation in refugee shelters should be avoided in favor of decentralized accommodation, and (3) to ensure diversity-sensitive care for all patients, the healthcare system must make adjustments to its structures and practices.