Health emergency: Two frameworks for deliberation

4Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Access to healthcare has been heavily affected by the COVID-19, according to the World Health Organization. Its impact has forced the distribution of resources and the need for justifiable priority-setting. A report published by the Spanish Ministry of Health has reiterated the importance of ethics in such a situation, and other entities have made recommendations for health professionals. However, it is not easy to make decisions in situations of unexpected scarcity, nor is it possible to reach a balance between equity and efficiency. Against this backdrop, the objective of the article is to consider the following levels: (1) decision making in a health emergency situation; (2) the framework of principles, with the equitable distribution and efficient management of resources, and (3) deliberation as a appropriate procedure for conflict resolution and as a process that fosters public policy transparency and accountability in public policies, including health policy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

De La Vieja de la Torre, M. T. L., & Vailhen, D. R. A. (2020). Health emergency: Two frameworks for deliberation. Enrahonar, 65, 37–46. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/enrahonar.1299

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free