Comparison of different semi-automated bioreactors for in vitro propagation of taro (Colocasia esculenta l. schott)

15Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Taro is important for its nutritional content, medicinal use, and bioethanol production. The aim of the present study was to compare different semi-automated bioreactors (SABs) during in vitro multiplication of C. esculenta. The SABs used were temporary immersion bioreactors (TIBs), SETIS™ bioreactors and ebb-and-flow bioreactors; semi-solid culture medium was used as a control treatment. At 30 d of culture, different developmental variables, determination of chlorophyll, stomatal content, and survival percentage during acclimatization were evaluated. SABs increased the shoot multiplication rate relative to the semi-solid medium; however, the SETIS™ bioreactor showed the highest shoot production, with 36 shoots per explant, and the highest chlorophyll content. The stomatal index was higher in the semi-solid medium compared to the SABs, while the percentage of closed stomata was higher in the SABs than in the semi-solid culture medium. The survival rate during acclimatization showed no differences among the culture systems assessed, obtaining survival rates higher than 99%. In conclusion, the SETIS™ bioreactor showed the highest multiplication rate; however, other bioreactor alternatives are available for semi-automation and cost reduction for micropropagation of C. esculenta.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mancilla-álvarez, E., Pérez-Sato, J. A., Núñez-Pastrana, R., Spinoso-Castillo, J. L., & Bello-Bello, J. J. (2021). Comparison of different semi-automated bioreactors for in vitro propagation of taro (Colocasia esculenta l. schott). Plants, 10(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10051010

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free