Non-Conventional Ingredients for Tilapia (Oreochromis spp.) Feed: A Systematic Review

2Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The objective of this systematic review was to identify and classify, from the available literature, non-conventional feed ingredients from terrestrial plants, animals, algae, and fungi which have been evaluated for their potential use for tilapia (Oreochromis spp.) production. For this purpose, 795 papers published in the Scopus and Web of Science databases between 2011 and 2021 were analyzed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology. Data on the growth rate (GR) and effects on weight gain (WG), specific growth rate (SGR) and feed conversion ratio (FCR); digestibility; fatty acid profile (FAP) of the fish carcass; and the survival rate (SR) were compiled in databases and summary tables. The results were refined according to different criteria, obtaining 144 documents that were pertinent for an in-depth analysis. From those, we found that 50.7% evaluated terrestrial plants, 22.2% animals, 13.9% algae, 9% fungi, and the remaining, combinations of some of the above categories. From the summarized results we concluded that most of the non-conventional sources analyzed have a positive potential impact as alternatives for producing tilapia. Survival was the most evaluated parameter, while digestibility was the least evaluated parameter.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zuluaga-Hernández, C. D., Hincapié, C. A., & Osorio, M. (2023, November 1). Non-Conventional Ingredients for Tilapia (Oreochromis spp.) Feed: A Systematic Review. Fishes. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes8110556

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free