Experimental comparison of PAM, CAP, and DMT modulations in phosphorescent white LED transmission link

35Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In the paper, an experimental comparison of pulse amplitude, carrierless amplitude-phase, and discrete multitone modulations is carried in a visible light communications link employing white phosphorescent light-emitting diode (LED) as a transmitter. By changing the modulation index, the influence of LED nonlinearity on the performance is studied. The results indicate similar performance of pulse-amplitude modulation (PAM) and carrier-less amplitude-phase (CAP) (with a slight advantage of the former) and substantially worse performance of DMT.

References Powered by Scopus

Indoor optical wireless communication: Potential and state-of-the-art

1158Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Broadband information broadcasting using LED-based interior lighting

499Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

1-Gb/s transmission over a phosphorescent white LED by using rate-adaptive discrete multitone modulation

436Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A review of gallium nitride LEDs for multi-gigabit-per-second visible light data communications

246Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

3.375-Gb/s RGB-LED based WDM visible light communication system employing PAM-8 modulation with phase shifted Manchester coding

79Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Visible light communications for industrial applications—challenges and potentials

74Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stepniak, G., Maksymiuk, L., & Siuzdak, J. (2015). Experimental comparison of PAM, CAP, and DMT modulations in phosphorescent white LED transmission link. IEEE Photonics Journal, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOT.2015.2427092

Readers over time

‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘21‘22‘230481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 20

69%

Researcher 6

21%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

7%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 25

86%

Physics and Astronomy 2

7%

Computer Science 1

3%

Environmental Science 1

3%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0