A New Paradigm for the Determination of Money Prices

  • Schmitt B
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Classical economists thought that goods had a value-dimension and were accordingly measured in units of value, e.g. in units of labour-value. Physicists measure space, time, energy and mass. In Classical economics the fundamental problem of the definition of economic value is already raised: are goods measured in some objective dimension, like energy or mass? Within the Classical school it was possible to make direct statements about quantities of value, in a given system of numeration, because each indivisible commodity was regarded as embodying units of cost defined in terms of its production by labour. When David Ricardo refers to a correspondence between two classes of objects, namely com?modities and numbers, he never posits an equivalence of the following type:

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schmitt, B. (1996). A New Paradigm for the Determination of Money Prices. In Money in Motion (pp. 104–138). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24525-3_5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free