Classical economists thought that goods had a value-dimension and were accordingly measured in units of value, e.g. in units of labour-value. Physicists measure space, time, energy and mass. In Classical economics the fundamental problem of the definition of economic value is already raised: are goods measured in some objective dimension, like energy or mass? Within the Classical school it was possible to make direct statements about quantities of value, in a given system of numeration, because each indivisible commodity was regarded as embodying units of cost defined in terms of its production by labour. When David Ricardo refers to a correspondence between two classes of objects, namely com?modities and numbers, he never posits an equivalence of the following type:
CITATION STYLE
Schmitt, B. (1996). A New Paradigm for the Determination of Money Prices. In Money in Motion (pp. 104–138). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24525-3_5
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.