Improved correlation between scores on the expanded disability status scale and cerebral lesion load in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Results of the application of new imaging methods

Abstract

We hypothesized that a better correlation between MRI and clinical measures of neurological disability using the expanded disability status scale (EDSS) in multiple sclerosis could be obtained by assessing lesion load only in and around the corticospinal tracts, since the EDSS is weighted towards motor and ambulatory deficits. Multiple sclerosis lesions in cerebral MRIs from 39 patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis were manually painted using a three-dimensional computer display tool and mapped into a standardized three-dimensional coordinate space. Total lesion load was then measured. A mask to expose only the corticospinal tract was extracted from an MRI atlas and used to measure lesion load in the corticospinal tract. To account for the residual anatomical variability among the different MRI volumes after stereotaxic transformation, the corticospinal tract mask was dilated to various degrees and the lesion load remeasured. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was used to calculate the correlation between the EDSS and total lesion load and corticospinal tract lesion load and between the EDSS subscores and total lesion load and corticospinal tract lesion load. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient between the EDSS and total lesion load was 0.6, probably reflecting the rather broad EDSS range represented in the study. The highest correlation of 0.67 was between the EDSS and corticospinal tract lesion load, dilated with a blurring kernel of 8-10 mm. The pyramidal subscore alone showed a weaker correlation with total lesion load, and with corticospinal tract lesion load, than did the overall EDSS, possibly reflecting the narrow range of disability in these subscores in patients with EDSS scores of 1-6.5. The imperfect correlation between the EDSS and corticospinal tract lesion load suggests that factors other than cerebral T2-weighted lesion volume are important determinants of disability.