Traditional fire-use, landscape transition, and the legacies of social theory past

14Citations
Citations of this article
71Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Fire-use and the scale and character of its effects on landscapes remain hotly debated in the paleo- and historical-fire literature. Since the second half of the nineteenth century, anthropology and geography have played important roles in providing theoretical propositions and testable hypotheses for advancing understandings of the ecological role of human–fire-use in landscape histories. This article reviews some of the most salient and persistent theoretical propositions and hypotheses concerning the role of humans in historical fire ecology. The review discusses this history in light of current research agendas, such as those offered by pyrogeography. The review suggests that a more theoretically cognizant historical fire ecology should strive to operationalize transdisciplinary theory capable of addressing the role of human variability in the evolutionary history of landscapes. To facilitate this process, researchers should focus attention on integrating more current human ecology theory into transdisciplinary research agendas.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Coughlan, M. R. (2015, December 1). Traditional fire-use, landscape transition, and the legacies of social theory past. Ambio. Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-015-0643-y

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free