Job satisfaction and leadership behavior brief measures: a development and validation study

0Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: Job satisfaction and leadership behavior are recognized by the organizational world as fundamental elements that influence the overall effectiveness of a company. However, as the first step for an adequate intervention on any of these variables, it is the evaluation. The purpose of this paper is to develop and validate two brief measures on job satisfaction and leadership behavior. Design/methodology/approach: The sample was made up of 246 workers located in Bogota, Colombia. The study was an instrumental research. To collect validity evidence, the internal structure and the relationship with other variables were used. For the evaluation of equity, the differential item functioning was analyzed according to the sex of the participants. Reliability was estimated through the ordinal omega coefficient. Findings: Both brief measures presented a unifactorial structure, where job satisfaction was measured by five items and leadership behavior by four items. On the other hand, only one item of leadership behavior showed differential item functioning; however, its magnitude was trivial. Also, convergent and discriminant evidence was provided for both measures, and the reliability levels were adequate. Originality/value: The measures developed represents an effort to briefly measure job satisfaction and leadership behavior. Likewise, it constitutes two of the few instruments to measure job satisfaction and leadership behavior in Latin American, representing a good alternative for the measurement of the referred constructs in an organizational context.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Acosta-Prado, J. C., Tafur-Mendoza, A. A., Zárate-Torres, R. A., & Pautt-Torres, G. M. (2023). Job satisfaction and leadership behavior brief measures: a development and validation study. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 31(3), 823–836. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-03-2021-2665

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free