Acid-base titration techniques: Metrological considerations

1Citations
Citations of this article
91Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Different measurement systems for acid-base titrations were evaluated to determine which one had the best metrological characteristics. These systems included volumetric and gravimetric titrations, which were combined with different detection systems: (i) potentiometry, (ii) acid-base indicator, and (iii) electrolytic conductivity. This article proposes a new approach for estimating the measurement uncertainty associated with the detection of the equivalence point. The results showed that, for the determination of the equivalence point, the lowest uncertainties were obtained by the potentiometric method in comparison with the conductometric method, whose bias was 78 times higher. The potentiometric method, however, was strongly dependent on the instrument resolution and/or the titrant amount that is added close to the equivalence point. It was also found that uncertainty decreases about 40% using gravimetric methods as compared to volumetric methods. When performing bias evaluation of the measurement systems according to the ISO 33:2015 guide, results showed that, among the evaluated methods, the gravimetric method with potentiometric detection presented the best metrological characteristics, with the lowest biases and uncertainties.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Morales-Erazo, L. V., González-Cárdenas, I. A., Abella-Gamba, J. P., & Ahumada-Forigua, D. A. (2019). Acid-base titration techniques: Metrological considerations. Revista Colombiana de Quimica, 48(1), 26–34. https://doi.org/10.15446/rev.colomb.quim.v48n1.72401

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free