Who Speaks for Science?

16Citations
Citations of this article
72Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Ironically, flat-Earthers, anti-vaxxers, and climate change naysayers trust in science. Unfortunately, they trust the wrong science. That conundrum lies at the heart of scientific literacy in an age of well-funded commercial and ideological interests and overwhelming digital information. The core question for the citizen-consumer is not philosophically “why trust science?” (Oreskes 2019) but sociologically “who speaks for science?” Teachers can help students learn how to navigate the treacherous territory of inevitably mediated communication and the vulnerabilities of epistemic dependence. Students need to understand the role of science communication practices (media literacy) and the roles of credibility, expertise and honesty and the deceptive strategies used by imitators of science to seem like credible voices for science.

References Powered by Scopus

The spread of true and false news online

5050Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cultural cognition of scientific consensus

1233Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection

860Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Ten competencies for the science misinformation crisis

24Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

To FRA or not to FRA: What is the question for science education?

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Science literacy in the twenty-first century: informed trust and the competent outsider

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Allchin, D. (2022). Who Speaks for Science? Science and Education, 31(6), 1475–1492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00257-4

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 18

56%

Researcher 7

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 13

54%

Physics and Astronomy 5

21%

Chemistry 3

13%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free