Nutrient adequacy for poor households in Africa would improve with higher income but not necessarily with lower food prices

5Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Most people in sub-Saharan Africa cannot afford a nutritious diet. Using consumer demand system modelling, this study estimates diet quality sensitivity to changing income and prices of specific foods in Malawi, Niger, Uganda, Tanzania and Nigeria.

References Powered by Scopus

Maternal and child undernutrition: global and regional exposures and health consequences

4482Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Global nutrition transition and the pandemic of obesity in developing countries

3094Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks in 188 countries, 1990-2013: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013

2273Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Local and regional food production diversity are positively associated with household dietary diversity in rural Africa

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Aquaculture carrying capacity estimates show that major African lakes and marine waters could sustainably produce 10–11 Mt of fish per year

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Balanced Choices: Examining the Impact of Dietary Diversity on BMI, Health Risks, and Rising Rates of Obesity in Kenya

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

McCullough, E. B., Lu, M., Nouve, Y., Arsenault, J., & Zhen, C. (2024). Nutrient adequacy for poor households in Africa would improve with higher income but not necessarily with lower food prices. Nature Food, 5(2), 171–181. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-024-00927-w

Readers over time

‘23‘24‘2508162432

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

40%

Researcher 5

33%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

27%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 4

31%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4

31%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3

23%

Medicine and Dentistry 2

15%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 2

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0