Mesenteric angiography for acute gastrointestinal bleed: Predictors of active extravasation and outcomes

23Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Ongoing gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) following endoscopic therapy and deciding between mesenteric angiography and surgery often challenge surgeons. We sought to identify predictors of positive angiographic study (active contrast medium extravasation) and characterize outcomes of embolization for acute GIB. Methods:We retrospectively analyzed angiographies for GIB at 2 teaching hospitals from January 2005 to December 2008. The X2, Wilcoxon rank sum and t tests determined significance. A Cox proportional hazards model was used for multivariate analyses. Results: Eighteen of 83 (22%) patients had active extravasation on initial angiog raphy and 25 (30%) were embolized. Patients with active extravasation had more packed red blood cell (PRBC; 5.3 v. 2.8 units, p > 0.001) and fresh frozen plasma (4.8 v. 1.7 units, p = 0.005) transfusions 24 hours preangiography and were more likely to be hemodynamically unstable at the time of the procedure (67% v. 28%, p = 0.001) than patients without active extravasation. Each unit of PRBC transfused increased the risk of a positive study by 30% (hazard ratio [HR] 1.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-1.6 per unit). Embolization did not decrease recurrent bleeding (53% v. 52%) or length of stay in hospital (28.1 v. 27.5 d, p = 0.95), but was associated with a trend toward fewer emergency surgical interventions (13% v. 26%, p = 0.31) and greater 30-day mortality (33% v. 7%, p = 0.006) than nonembolization. Blind embolization was performed in 10 of 83 (12%) patients and was found to be an independent predictor of death in patients without active extravasation (HR 9.2, 95% CI 1.5-55.9). Conclusion: The number of PRBC units transfused correlates with greater likelihood of a positive study. There was a significant increase in mortality in patients who underwent angioembolization. Large prospective studies are needed to further characterize the indications for angiography and blind embolization. © 2012 Canadian Medical Association.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lee, L., Iqbal, S., Najmeh, S., Fata, P., Razek, T., & Khwaja, K. (2012). Mesenteric angiography for acute gastrointestinal bleed: Predictors of active extravasation and outcomes. Canadian Journal of Surgery, 55(6), 382–388. https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.005611

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free