Analyzing recommendations interactions in clinical guidelines: Impact of action type hierarchies and causation beliefs

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Accounting for patients with multiple health conditions is a complex task that requires analysing potential interactions among recommendations meant to address each condition. Although some approaches have been proposed to address this issue, important features still require more investigation, such as (re)usability and scalability. To this end, this paper presents an approach that relies on reusable rules for detecting interactions among recommendations coming from various guidelines. It extends previously proposed models by introducing the notions of action type hierarchy and causation beliefs, and provides a systematic analysis of relevant interactions in the context of multimorbidity. Finally, the approach is assessed based on a case-study taken from the literature to highlight the added value of the approach.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zamborlini, V., da Silveira, M., Pruski, C., ten Teije, A., & van Harmelen, F. (2015). Analyzing recommendations interactions in clinical guidelines: Impact of action type hierarchies and causation beliefs. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 9105, pp. 317–326). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19551-3_40

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free