Bipedicle-Conjoined Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flaps for Unilateral Breast Reconstruction in Overweight and Obese Patients: Do the Benefits Outweigh the Risks?

12Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background Some surgeons have advocated for the use of bipedicle-conjoined deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps in unilateral autologous breast reconstruction in thin patients in whom a hemiabdominal flap is deemed insufficient. There have been no studies to date, however, exploring complication rates for bipedicle-conjoined DIEP flaps for unilateral reconstruction in overweight or obese patients. Methods The authors performed a retrospective review of two senior authors' patients from 2013 until 2018. In this time period, 71 patients underwent unilateral breast reconstruction with bipedicle-conjoined DIEP flaps. The patients were divided into normal weight (body mass index [BMI] < 25, n = 30), and overweight/obese (BMI > 25, n = 41) groups. Outcomes were reviewed for both major and minor complications. Results The average BMI of the normal group was 23.1 ± 1.3 kg/m 2, while the average BMI of the overweight/obese group was 28.9 ± 4.0 kg/m 2 (p < 0.01). There were no significant differences in demographics or comorbidities between the two groups. There were no statistically significant differences in the overall incidence of major or minor complications between the two groups (major: overweight/obese = 12.1%, normal BMI = 10.0%, p = 0.39; minor: overweight/obese = 39.0%, normal BMI = 36.7%, p = 0.47). The rate of moderate fat necrosis was significantly higher in the overweight/obese group (overweight/obese = 9.8%, normal BMI = 0%, p = 0.04). Conclusion Unilateral breast reconstruction with bipedicle-conjoined DIEP flaps can be performed safely in overweight and obese patients. The use of bipedicle-conjoined DIEP flaps in this population allows surgeons to provide overweight or obese patients with reconstructions that are commensurate with their body habitus and/or contralateral breast.

References Powered by Scopus

Trends in obesity among adults in the United States, 2005 to 2014

2350Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Refinements in free flap breast reconstruction: the free bilateral deep inferior epigastric perforator flap anastomosed to the internal mammary artery

263Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Impact of obesity on outcomes in breast reconstruction: Analysis of 15,93& patients from the ACS-NSQIP datasets

166Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Breast Reconstruction Completion in the Obese: Does Reconstruction Technique Make a Difference in Its Achievement?

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Algorithm for covering circumferential wound on limbs with ALTP or/and DIEP flaps based on chain-linked design and combined transplantation

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Bipedicled Total Abdominal versus Unipedicled Hemiabdominal Free Flaps for Unilateral Breast Reconstruction

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sultan, S. M., Seth, A. K., Lamelas, A. M., Greenspun, D. T., & Erhard, H. A. (2020). Bipedicle-Conjoined Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flaps for Unilateral Breast Reconstruction in Overweight and Obese Patients: Do the Benefits Outweigh the Risks? Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery, 36(5), 346–352. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1701209

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

71%

Researcher 2

29%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 8

80%

Neuroscience 1

10%

Chemistry 1

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free