Barriers to the accessibility and continuity of health-care services in people with multiple sclerosis

55Citations
Citations of this article
103Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) face a range of barriers to accessing and using health-care services. The aim of this review was to identify specific barriers to accessing and using healthcare services based on a continuum of the health-care delivery system. Methods: Literature searches were conducted in the PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Web of Science databases. The following terms were searched as subject headings, key words, or abstracts: health care, access, barriers, physical disability, and multiple sclerosis. The literature search produced 361 potentially relevant citations. After screening titles, abstracts, and citations, eight citations were selected for full-text review. Results: Health-care barriers were divided into three continuous phases of receiving health care. In the before-visit phase, the most commonly identified barrier was transportation. In the during-visit phase, communication quality was the major concern. In the after-visit phase, discontinued referral was the major barrier encountered. Conclusions: There are multiple interrelated barriers to accessing and using health-care services along the health-care delivery continuum for people with MS and its associated physical disabilities, ranging from complex and long-recognized barriers that will likely require extended advocacy to create policy changes to issues that can and should be addressed through relatively minor changes in health-care delivery practices, improved care coordination, and increased provider awareness, education, and responsiveness to patients' needs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chiu, C., Bishop, M., Pionke, J. J., Strauser, D., & Santens, R. L. (2017). Barriers to the accessibility and continuity of health-care services in people with multiple sclerosis. International Journal of MS Care, 19(6), 313–322. https://doi.org/10.7224/1537-2073.2016-016

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free