Age-specific differences in the duration of prehospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation administered by emergency medical service providers necessary to achieve favorable neurological outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

9Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The appropriate duration of prehospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) administered by emergency medical service (EMS) providers for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) necessary to achieve 1-month survival with favorable neurological outcome (Cerebral Performance Category 1 or 2, CPC 1–2) is unclear and could differ by age. Methods and Results: We analyzed the records of 35,709 adult OHCA patients with return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) before hospital arrival in a prospectively recorded Japanese registry between 2011 and 2014. The CPR duration was defined as the time from CPR initiation by EMS providers to prehospital ROSC. The rate of 1-month CPC 1–2 was 21.4% (7,650/35,709). The CPR duration was independently and inversely associated with 1-month CPC 1–2 (adjusted odds ratio, 0.93 per 1-min increment; 95% confidence interval, 0.93–0.94). The CPR duration increased with age (P<0.001). However, the CPR duration beyond which the proportion of OHCA patients with 1-month CPC 1–2 decreased to <1% declined with age: 28 min for patients aged 18–64 years, 25 min for 65–74 years, 23 min for 75–84 years, 20 min for 85–94 years, and 18 min for ≥95 years. Conclusions: In patients who achieved prehospital ROSC after OHCA, the duration of CPR administered by EMS providers necessary to achieve 1-month CPC 1–2 varied by age.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Funada, A., Goto, Y., Tada, H., Teramoto, R., Shimojima, M., Hayashi, K., & Yamagishi, M. (2017). Age-specific differences in the duration of prehospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation administered by emergency medical service providers necessary to achieve favorable neurological outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Circulation Journal, 81(5), 652–659. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-16-1251

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free