Crustal scale detachment in the Himalayas: A reappraisal

Abstract

According to the most popular tectonic model of the Himalayas proposed by a number of scientists the Indian crustal material underthrusts the Himalayas at a low angle and is relatively free of deformation compared to the overlying accreted material that makes up the Himalayan mountain chain. In this work we have carried out local earthquake tomography for the Garwhal-Kumaun Himalayas to estimate P- and S-wave velocity variations (Vp and Vs, respectively) and variation in their ratio (Vp/Vs) that would indicate the structure of the Himalayas and the underlying Indian crust in this part of the Himalayas. The results indicate that there is crustal level folding and faulting in this region indicating that the underlying Indian crustal material has also undergone deformation unlike what was postulated for the entire Himalayas by some workers before. By comparing our tomographic result with that for the eastern Nepal-southern Tibet region, it is concluded that there is variation in mode of deformation along the trend of the Himalayas. This observation matches well with the observed velocity variation in the upper mantle of these two regions reported by others. The area under investigation falls within a region where there is more oblique convergence between India and Eurasia compared to the Nepal Himalayas region. This may explain why such variation in mode of deformation is observed. The ratio Vp/Vs gets affected by strength of material. Presence or absence of fluid filled fractures or molten material affects it most strongly in the crustal region. The variation in Vp/Vs in the study area shows that almost the entire crust here have enough rheological strength such that it can store strain energy that can be released through earthquakes. A zone of low Vp/Vs beginning at the higher Himalayas and dipping towards SW is observed. This zone also has high Vp and Vs and is observed even when inversion is carried out with very high damping value. These observations do not suggest that seismic hazard will be less in the study area. © 2010 The Authors Geophysical Journal International © 2010 RAS.